97色伦午夜国产亚洲精品-欧美大胆老熟妇乱子伦视频-国产精品国产三级国产aⅴ下载-av在线无码专区一区-国产精品久久久久久无毒不卡

Home About us News center Products Innovation Careers
industry news
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Tax vs. fee at issue in Denver bag-ban proposal
 
 

By Jeremy Carroll
STAFF REPORTER
Published: August 23, 2013 2:40 pm ET


While officials in Denver are expected to debate the merits of a plastic and paper bag fee in early September, opponents of the measure say the fee isn’t a fee at all.
Instead they say it’s a tax.
While sometimes the discussion around bag fees or taxes is one of semantics, the distinction is actually a very important one in Colorado, where a state constitutional amendment forces an election on any potential tax increase. But if the measure is labeled a fee, no vote is needed.
“The state and local governments have taken that fee loophole and just run amok with it,” said Jim Manley, staff attorney with the Mountain States Legal Foundation. “Instead of structuring fees for service, they just label stuff a fee and figure that’s good enough to avoid the voter approval requirements of [the Taxpayers Bill of Rights].”
The Mountain States Legal Foundation is currently suing Aspen, Colo., for a bag fee the city passed in 2011. That ordinance bans plastic bags, but puts a 20-cent fee on all paper bags distributed at grocery stores in the city.
“Whatever the judge decides in the Aspen case is going to be directly relevant to Denver,” Manley said. “If we’re successful in Aspen, then Denver is going to have to step back and take another look at what they’re planning on doing.”
Denver’s city attorney did not return a phone call seeking comment on the issue, but officials did meet in closed session to discuss the legality of the measure.
Council member Debbie Ortega has pushed the measure forward, introducing it in July. According to city documents, there are an estimated 130 million single-use shopping bags used at Denver’s large grocery and convenience stores annually. Those bags turn into 4.3 tons of waste.
The 5-cent fee will be split between the city and the store handing out and charging for the bag, according to the proposal. The city would take 3 cents of the charge and the remaining 2 cents would be given to the stores to help pay for the record-keeping and maintenance of the program.
The city estimates it will earn $1.6 million in revenue from the measure, which it will use for education and reusable bags to be given to lower-income residents.
Ultimately, whether the measure is labeled a tax or a fee does not actually matter, said Phil Rozenski, policy chair for the American Progressive Bag Alliance. Rozenski also is director of sustainability and marketing for Hilex Poly Co. LLC of Harts¬ville, S.C.
“Whether it’s a tax or a fee, the impact is exactly the same,” he said. “It’s a regressive fee or tax on families. The lower the family income, the greater the impact. It will still take the same amount of money out of a family’s pocket whether it’s a tax or a fee.”
Denver’s proposal passed the city’s Health, Safety, Education and Services Committee on Aug. 20 and is expected before the full City Council in early September.
Meanwhile in California, two communities took on the issue of bag bans. Lawmakers in Los Gatos, located just south of San Jose, voted to ban plastic bags while lawmakers in El Cerrito, near Oakland, took a step toward banning plastic bags and polystyrene foam containers.
Los Gatos City Council voted 4-1 to pass a ban on plastic bags and a fee of 10 cents on paper bags to begin in early 2014.
The bans in El Cerrito passed unanimously on first reading, and a final vote will take place Sept. 17, El Cerrito clerk Cheryl Morse told Plastics News.
The debate over plastics bags goes back to 2011 in El Cerrito, with officials approving a plan for a more regional approach to the issue. The City Council took the issue up again after the West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority adopted a model ordinance for communities to pass and concluded an environmental impact report.
The ban extends to all retail establishments except restaurants and nonprofit resale shops. The ordinance would also charge customers 5 cents for paper bags until 2016, when that fee rises to 10 cents per paper bag.
The polystyrene ban would restrict food establishments from giving customers takeout food in disposable PS. It would then force those establishments to use compostable, recyclable or reusable food containers. The ban would become effective Jan. 1 and enforceable July 1.
With the California state bill banning plastic bags stalling earlier this year, officials with the Californians Against Waste are encouraging more local ordinances.

 
About us
company profile
company culture
version and strategy
company history
certification
patents
contact
News center
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Products
products catalog
technical support
Innovation
create value
production line
QA&QC
new technique info
Copyright:King-Tech China Co.,Ltd
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕一区二区三区在线播放| 少妇久久久久久人妻无码| 人妻一区二区久久| 亚洲精品欧美二区三区中文字幕| 日韩在线视频线观看一区| 免费 黄 色 人成 视频 在 线| 久久国产精久久精产国| 青青草免费公开视频| 无码a∨高潮抽搐流白浆| 国产高清中文手机在线观看| 51国产黑色丝袜高跟鞋| 亚洲精品国产一区黑色丝袜| 欧美日韩中文字幕视频不卡一二区| 亚洲欧洲美色一区二区三区| 国产成人无码aⅴ片在线观看导航| 久久夜色精品国产亚洲| 131美女爱做视频| 国产精品一区欧美韩国日本| 激情内射亚洲一区二区三区| 狠狠综合久久综合88亚洲| 国产成人久久精品av| 人人做人碰人人添| 无码av不卡免费播放| 亚洲国产一区二区三区| 欧洲vat一区二区三区| 中文丝袜人妻一区二区| 国产在线精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲日韩av无码中文字幕美国| 熟女乱一区二区| 国产丝袜高跟一区二区三区| 国产午夜无码精品免费看动漫| 国产亚洲精品久久久美女18黄| 亚洲精品久久久www小说| 亚洲妇女水蜜桃av网网站| 日韩av无码精品人妻系列| 97超级碰碰碰久久久久| 欧洲女人牲交性开放视频| 久久久国产一区二区三小早川怜子| 99在线精品视频高潮喷吹| 亚洲日韩∨a无码中文字幕| 日日摸夜夜添狠狠添欧美|